Life is short

Posted: August 12, 2025 in Uncategorized
Tags: , , , ,

Life is short…I am writing this as one of my highest-level appeals. Please, I implore you to pay attention.

On November 6th, when the U.S. election ended, I spoke to the people closest to me about what it meant for our world. Intellectually, I knew the dangers. I talked about them often. But deep down, I didn’t believe we would end up here. I was upset enough to stop writing about politics for months. I hoped it wouldn’t come to this.

But here we are. Donald Trump, and let’s stop sugarcoating this, is a dangerous man. I believe he is a psychopath. If he is capable of genuine love, perhaps some child or grandchild will tell me so. I cannot comprehend a human being with such a lack of compassion, such an absence of moral core, without some clinical explanation.

And now we have the National Guard moving into Washington, D.C. We don’t know exactly what’s next, another city, another country? On Friday he will be in Alaska, where the only thing separating Russia and North America is a narrow strip of the Bering Strait. Trump is set to meet with Vladimir Putin there. That’s not just a photo op. And it terrifies me. What exactly will Trump promise him? What would he give away? We know Putin doesn’t respect Trump, but he can use him. And that’s more dangerous.

The picture I’m using for this post comes from Alaska, but it’s not just any Alaska picture. It’s my late friend Marcus Payne, flying his beloved aircraft over his homeland’s ice fields. Marcus was a Renaissance man of unbelievable talent. He wasn’t just an airshow pilot and TV personality, he was a U.S. Air Force veteran, a lawyer, a Washington lobbyist, a missionary, and an environmentalist. And oh, the political conversations we had. We lost him tragically nine years doing what he loved, but I can tell you, we would have had a lot to talk about now. He believed in living with purpose, and he understood how fragile both our environment and our democracies are. That’s why this image matters, because the stakes we face are as sharp and real as the glacier walls beneath his wings.

For my fellow Albertans flirting with separatism, listen carefully: if you think Alberta could somehow be better off alone, you are wrong. You will not be strong enough, no matter how much oil and gas you have, to stand against the American machine. You will lose control over your resources. You will lose your say in how they are managed. And you will be at the mercy of leaders who would happily trade your future for their personal gain.

I’ve written post after post asking people to explain how Pierre Poilievre would operate in today’s geopolitical climate, the one Mark Carney is currently navigating. I’ve yet to see a single thoughtful, detailed answer. Publicly, I get slogans. Privately, I get messages that range from nonsensical to outright frightening. But not once has anyone been able to describe how Poilievre would handle Trump, Putin, or China while safeguarding Canada’s sovereignty.

Although I always write from the heart, with passion, urgency, and the hope that people will better inform themselves, this time is different. This one is affecting me more deeply. No one likes to think about being in the last part of their life. But I never imagined I’d be in this stage terrified for the world I’m leaving behind for my children, grandchildren, and everyone who comes after. My need to speak up is more urgent than it has ever been. I will not let anyone say I stayed silent. I will not have it said that I didn’t try to help people understand how critical our situation is.

I know it’s hard to know what we can do. People ask me all the time, “But what can I do?” Maybe my words here don’t feel as effective as they could be. After all, most of my readers already think like I do. But if you have friends in the U.S., or anywhere else in the world, share this with them. We need to go beyond “I hate Trump” or shallow political insults. We need to talk about what his leadership really means.

These are not just distraction tactics from Trump. It’s his lifetime pattern. Call it narcissism if you like, but it’s something far beyond the everyday kind.

So, who still stands by him? In my view, there are four groups:

1. The MAGA base, statistically more likely to be less informed or less educated. That’s not an insult, it’s reality. But it’s also no excuse. 2. Christian fundamentalists who are sometimes organized under banners like The Family, who push a narrow, rigid worldview into public policy. Their vision of morality is less about compassion and more about control. 3. Billionaires (and “billionaires-lite”) they care only about increasing already obscene fortunes, no matter the human cost. and 4. Republican lawmakers who have abandoned any vision of what is right, and sold their integrity to cling to power.

And to those lawmakers, I ask again: did you not think of your daughters when women’s rights were stripped away? Where are you as education and research to benefit your grandchildren is erased. And how can you ignore that the United States is beginning to look more like The Handmaid’s Tale than the “land of the free”? And to the daughters and sons of these lawmakers, the millennials, the Gen Xers, please speak up. Maybe hearing it from you will pierce the armour of power and greed. Someday those lawmakers will be on their deathbed, and will their final words be, “My God, I ignored my own child so I could hold onto my seat”? How pitiful.

We are standing at a point where silence is complicity. Our voices have to be loud, so loud they can’t be ignored, so loud they carry across borders and into the rooms where decisions are being made. Every single person’s voice matters, no matter how small you think your reach is. I, for one, will use mine in every way possible. If my role in this fight is to write these words, to push, prod, and occasionally shove people into paying attention then I will keep doing it. Not because I like shouting into the void, but because I refuse to be like one of those legislators lying on my deathbed thinking, I didn’t do enough.

Hope and defiance can live in the same breath. Hope says there is still time to change things. Defiance says we will fight like hell to make sure we do. So write, speak, march, vote, shout, actually whatever your voice looks like, use it. Because the worst thing we can do right now is nothing. And nothing is exactly what those in power are counting on.

August 10, 2025

Posted: August 10, 2025 in Uncategorized

It’s Sunday morning, after a hell of a week. A week where I’ve been juggling more than one family medical crisis, not minor ones, and doing it the way I’ve learned to survive: research, investigate, organize, deploy. Keep the exterior calm, keep the machinery running, don’t let the cracks show. People tell me, “If I didn’t know you were telling the truth, I wouldn’t believe it.” And I understand why. But inside, I’m barely holding the seams together.

And I think that’s exactly where the world is right now. We are moving through events that should be shaking us to our core, but instead we’re treating them like background noise. We’ve normalized chaos.

Look at this week alone. A war criminal who cannot set foot in most of the world without risking arrest is being welcomed into the United States for a meeting with Donald Trump in Alaska on Friday. Let’s not kid ourselves, Vladimir Putin is not flying across the globe to “negotiate peace.” He’s told us outright, in conversations like the one with Steve Witkoff, that his goal is total control of Ukraine. Full stop. And Trump? Trump has no cards here. Putin thinks he’s a fool, and he’ll play him accordingly.

Then there’s Israel, officially deciding to take over Gaza, as if annexation will magically erase decades of conflict and humanitarian crisis. The silence from the President of the United States on this is deafening.

And here in Canada, we need to understand something uncomfortable: we are a vulnerable country. To the United States, we are what Ukraine is to Russia. Donald Trump has already told us, in his own words, that he’s doing everything he promised he would do. If one of those promises was about controlling Canada’s future, why wouldn’t we take him at his word? If you want to call that fear-mongering, fine. But reality doesn’t care about our comfort zone.

Not in a generation have we seen the kind of instability we’re facing now. And unfortunately, we are removed from the people Tom Brokaw called “The Greatest Generation”, our parents, grandparents, and great-grandparents who defended democracy through both the First and Second World Wars. They’d lived through depression, dictatorship, and the real possibility of losing their freedoms. They knew what was at stake, and they acted like it. I’m not sure we’re ready for what’s coming, and that scares me more than the crises themselves.

Because make no mistake, we are in it. And most people are walking through it half-asleep. I understand the need for balance, to protect our own lives, our own communities, the things we can control. But numbness is not resilience. We are in a live situation with stakes that can’t be overstated, and too many people are treating it like tomorrow’s problem. So for Canada in this story? I remain committed to giving Mark Carney the room to navigate this without making a fatal move. I understand the people asking, “But what is he actually doing?” My answer: if you’re skeptical about Carney’s capability, tell me, IN DETAIL what you think Pierre Poilievre would be doing differently right now. And then ask yourself if that answer makes you feel safer.

Because this is not a time for hollow slogans. This is a time for plans. For strategy. For leaders who don’t flinch under pressure. Some are doing as I described above. Researching, investigating, organizing, and then they deploy. I’ve learned in my personal life that functioning under pressure doesn’t mean you’re unaffected, it means you keep moving because stopping isn’t an option.

Canada is remaining calm and our leadership is speaking out. But much of the world is not doing the same thing right now. I prefer someone steering the boat calmly toward a destination to someone drifting blind until they’re smashed apart on the rocks. Because by the time some realize it, there won’t be enough pieces left to put back together. I still believe PM Carney is watching the weather and navigating his route carefully. These are defining moments for our world.

August 3, 2025

Posted: August 10, 2025 in Uncategorized
Tags: , , , ,

UPDATE: It is important to note that I wrote this to explain the structure of the process. There are many aspects of it that should be revisited and one that I often mention in more detailed conversations around the exclusion of Hydro power in the calculation. So take this as a very general explanation as it was intended.

Equalization payments 101. I’m beginning to believe a lot of citizens skipped grade six. Jason Stephan, MLA for Red Deer and member of Alberta’s Treasury Board, posted today about what he viewed is the money Alberta ‘sends’ to Quebec saying it’s “too bad Quebec didn’t separate.”

Let’s just pause on that for a second. A sitting MLA who is responsible for provincial finances is wishing a founding province had left Confederation. Because of taxes? That’s not just a cheap political shot. That’s a fundamental misunderstanding of how Canada works. And how the equalization system works.

And unfortunately, he’s not alone. So let’s try this one more time at a grade six civics level, since that seems to be where the understanding stopped. Equalization isn’t Alberta sending cheques to Quebec. It’s not a personal donation to daycare in the Maritimes.

Here’s the truth. Canada is a country, not a profit-sharing corporation. Let’s think of it like a big family. Alberta is the high-earning sibling who makes good money, works hard, maybe brags about it a bit too much at Thanksgiving. New Brunswick? That’s the older relative. Wise, tough, but not pulling in as much these days. Quebec? Well, Quebec is the family member who insists on doing everything their own way but still shows up for supper.

And like any decent family, we try to make sure everyone has what they need, even if we don’t all contribute the same amount.

That’s where equalization comes in. Here’s how it actually works. The federal government collects taxes from across the country (and yes, Alberta pays a big chunk because we earn more. Please know that’s not punishment, it’s math). Then, based on a formula, it gives equalization transfers to provinces that don’t have the same ability to raise their own revenue. That means more help for places like New Brunswick, PEI, and Manitoba so they can offer public services at reasonably similar levels and tax rates. Provinces like Newfoundland for example have been both the successful family member and the one that needed some help on occasion.

And just to be crystal clear Alberta does not send money directly to other provinces. No one’s mailing cheques from Edmonton to Quebec City. Equalization payments come from the federal government to each provinces.

And about that formula? It can be reviewed. And it has been including during the Harper years. So if Jason Stephan thinks it’s broken, maybe he should dig into those files before continuing the negative narrative. While he’s at it, maybe he can get a memo to Premier Danielle Smith because if there’s one thing this Premier loves more than chaos, it’s finding someone else to blame for it.

Canada is not a zero-sum game. Every province brings something to the table. Not all bring cash and thank God, because if money were the only measure of worth, we’d be a pretty soulless country.

Right now, we’re dealing with global instability, trade tensions, economic insecurity, war, and climate pressure on everything from food to fuel. The job right now is to take care of our own. That means defending each other, not dividing each other.

If we need to revisit how the family handles its finances, then fine we will. But not in the current situation our country (family) is in. And not because one provincial politician needs a distraction from his own lack of solutions.

Maybe Quebec is the kid who’s still living at home, expects dinner on the table at six, and reminds you regularly they might move out if the menu ever changes. Alberta is the sibling who just landed a big promotion and can’t stop telling everyone else how to run their lives. Annoying? Absolutely. But guess what? They’re both still family.

Because in the end these provinces are all part of this amazing country and in my view we are family. And like any real family, we all have a seat at this table. No one gets to kick anyone else out.

We argue. We pass the potatoes. We fight over who has to do the dishes. But we also make sure everyone’s plate has something on it. That’s not weakness. It’s the strength of the system.

So if the way we split the bill needs a second look, we’ll do that. Together. Like grown-ups. But let’s not confuse family finances with family values. Because from this citizens point of view we make sure everyone gets dinner on their plate. We argue, we grumble, and sometimes we roll our eyes at each other. But we don’t cut anyone out just because it’s politically convenient.
We show up. We share. We do the work. That’s what being Canadian actually means.

August 2, 2025

Posted: August 3, 2025 in Uncategorized

This one’s a little different than what I usually write but it’s been on my mind, and maybe it’s been on yours too.

In the past few weeks, I’ve had more than a few people reach out, asking the same thing: “What can we do? How do we push back when so much feels out of our hands?” My answer is this: Do what you can, where you are, with what you’ve got. For me, it’s writing. But it’s also being intentional with my wallet. Every dollar is a choice. And right now, those choices matter more than ever.

When Trump started spewing garbage about Canada being the “51st state,” and the tariff threats rolled back in, we had a moment of clarity. Canadians started rallying to support each other. Buying local. Choosing Canadian. Showing up for small businesses. It was fierce. It was patriotic. It was hopeful. But lately I feel like it’s faded.

Summer’s here. Canadian produce is everywhere. Farmers’ markets are full. And there are small non CUSMA industries making some great products. And yet, just yesterday, I caught myself about to click “Buy Now” on Amazon. I stopped myself. What the hell am I doing?

This isn’t about guilt. It’s about attention. Awareness. Intention. We’re not powerless, but we do need to be reminded. We need to recommit to buying Canadian first, not just for pride, but for our future. The next CUSMA review is coming, and it won’t be friendly. We’re dealing with a U.S. government that’s perfectly comfortable slapping tariffs on our industries while treating Canada like a trade afterthought. If we don’t push back with purpose, we’ll pay for it in lost jobs, shuttered businesses, and even more dependency. Trump intends to win using economic power. Our governments (most) are doing what they can to negotiate and help. Note Danielle Smith receives the ‘non’ participation award.

We won’t get it perfect. Some things just aren’t made here. Some people don’t have the financial flexibility to spend extra. And that’s okay. It’s not about purity, it’s about participation. If you can only shift 25% of your habits, that’s still a shift.

The other day, I sampled a grainy mustard from a family farm in southern Alberta. The farmer himself was doing the demo. It was a dollar more than what I’d usually spend and I almost walked away. But it was damn good. And I realized in that moment that this is what matters. Real people, real products and real community. I bought two jars. It felt like something small that actually mattered.

Same with coffee. I’ve swapped out the big brands for Three Sisters, a roaster out of BC that’s now my favourite. That wasn’t just about nationalism, it was just good coffee. But now it’s also about choosing home first.

I’ve cancelled cable, too. Tired of paying into a media machine dominated by U.S. networks that filter everything through their political noise. I’ll figure out my news another way. But I won’t keep funding a system that doesn’t care about my country unless it’s looking for leverage. And I’m saying no to U.S. travel.That’s not bitterness. It’s boundaries.

Luckily, we have options. We have trade partnerships with Mexico and the EU that give us access to excellent products, often with higher labour or environmental standards than the ones we’re importing from the States. If we have to look elsewhere, look there.

So if you’re asking what you can do, start here: Revisit the apps and websites that help identify Canadian-made goods. Ask your grocery store where their products come from and tell them why you care. Choose local when you can. Even once in a while makes a difference. Shop at a farmer’s market. Pick Alberta beef or Manitoba pork. Grab Ontario wine, Alberta mead and honey or Okanagan fruit. If you’re reaching for any product, check if there’s a domestic one nearby. If not, maybe Mexico or Europe instead of the U.S. We don’t have to do everything. But we do have to do something.

This isn’t a one-time blip. It’s a new normal. It’s going to take vigilance, not just passion. We rallied once. We need to rally again. With intention. With consistency. And with clarity about what’s at stake.

So no, I can’t fix the global trade system from my kitchen table.

But I can choose what lettuce I buy. I can choose what coffee I drink. I can write this. And if you’re reading it, maybe you’ll choose something different today too. I’m not just done buying American. I’m done sleepwalking. And if that makes me one jar of mustard closer to a more resilient Canada I’ll take it.

August 1, 2025

Posted: August 3, 2025 in Uncategorized

Last night, Donald Trump signed the executive order.

We knew it was coming. We’ve been circling this moment for days. And he made it official: tariffs on Canadian imports, those not covered under CUSMA, are now 35%, up from 25%.

Sounds dramatic. And it is. But before anyone spirals, let’s get something clear. Between 80% and 90% of our exports are CUSMA-compliant, which means they’re still crossing the border tariff-free. Some sources suggest the number could be as high as 90% and I hope that’s the case. But I’ve chosen to use the 80% figure to be cautious and not overstate the protection CUSMA offers. There are still a significant number of businesses, especially smaller ones, that either don’t meet the origin requirements or don’t have the capacity to navigate the complex paperwork needed for certification. So while the majority of our trade is covered, I think it’s important not to gloss over the vulnerable share that isn’t.That matters. Trump wants this to feel like a full shutdown. It’s not.

The approximately 20% that just got hit? That’s often small and mid-sized businesses who either don’t meet the complex “rules of origin,” or haven’t been able to file the mountain of paperwork to prove they do. Global supply chains. Raw materials. Unfinished parts. It’s not nothing. But it’s not everything either.

And yet, even with all that said, that’s not the headline. The real concern remains the sectoral tariffs that haven’t moved such as lumber, autos, steel and aluminum, autos. That’s where the real pain is. That’s where entire towns such as Quesnel, Windsor, Hamilton, Trois-Rivières and Nackawic hang in the balance. And those sectors remain under siege.

Trump again tried to justify this latest hit by blaming fentanyl and Canadian “inaction”, which is laughable, if it weren’t so reckless. Canada accounts for 1% of fentanyl entering the U.S. And Carney’s government has already been investing heavily in border enforcement, drug interdiction, aerial surveillance, and the toughest border legislation in our history.

So no, this isn’t about fentanyl, or dairy or fairness. It’s about power, control amd performance. And it’s personal. That much is crystal clear.

Sometimes I wonder if I’m just repeating myself. Saying the same thing over and over again. And maybe I am. But then I remind myself that this is exactly why I have to keep saying it. Because this isn’t about scoring points. It’s about protecting truth in a storm of lies. It’s about telling the story before someone else rewrites it for us.

I stayed up late, flipping channels, listening to the analysts, the trade experts, the chaos. And somewhere in that mess, I heard a quiet comment that stuck with me: a researcher compared Canada to the Doozers from Fraggle Rock, those tiny green builders who kept constructing while the Fraggles tore everything down. That’s us right now. We build. Quietly. Relentlessly. No matter who’s smashing the walls around us.

And just before I went to bed, Prime Minister Mark Carney released a statement, and to be blunt, it echoed exactly what I’ve been thinking, “While the Canadian government is disappointed by this action, we remain committed to CUSMA… The U.S. average tariff rate on Canadian goods remains one of the lowest for all its trading partners. For each impacted sector, the Canadian government will act to protect Canadian jobs, invest in our industrial competitiveness, buy Canadian and diversify our export markets.”

This is the tone I needed to hear. Not panic just a focus on being intentional. Carney didn’t match Trump’s bluster. He focused on what we can control. Things such as cutting interprovincial trade barriers, investing in national infrastructure, using Canadian workers and resources, and becoming our own best customer.

And then this line. We need to keep this front and centre. “We can give ourselves more than any foreign government can ever take away.”

The timing of a Canadian offensive, if one is even needed, is still to be determined. But let’s not forget that we have tools. We have leverage. From reciprocal tariffs to the natural resources the U.S. depends on, to the American bonds that we hold. There are many forms of pressure we’ve yet to apply. We don’t fight recklessly, we fight with strategy, discipline, and purpose. And that means knowing when to act, and when to hold.

There’s your contrast. One man weaponizes policy like a tantrum. Another leans into building a country that doesn’t flinch.

So to simplify here’s where we stand. 80% of Canadian trade remains protected under CUSMA, 20% just got squeezed harder especially for smaller firms, sectoral tariffs are still the real crisis and once again Trump is spiraling, lying, blaming, and inflating.

And Canada? We’re building. With purpose. With partners. With grit.

I didn’t set out to write every day. I didn’t plan on logging this much road. But if even one person feels a little more grounded, a little more informed from what I share then it’s worth it. The crack in the road may widen but so will our resolve.

Canada Strong and Free!

July 30, 2025

Posted: August 3, 2025 in Uncategorized

August 1st is coming and its tense. Canadians, and Canadian businesses are nervous. That’s understandable. But nervous doesn’t mean panicked, and it certainly doesn’t mean acting stupidly. What we need now is belief. Belief in what we have. Belief in who we are. Belief in the strength that has always shown up when we’ve needed it most.

That’s a quote, or at least the spirit of one, from Arlene Dickinson. And when she speaks, a lot of us in this country listen. She’s not just a Dragon’s Den celebrity, she’s a business leader who understands Canada, and the mindset of people trying to make a living through ups and downs, pressure and politics.

I share that perspective. And as we stare down the barrel of Trump’s tariff threat deadline, we need to remember who we are, and who we’re not. Because here’s what we are not: We’re not weak. We’re not reckless. And we’re not going to be bullied into bad deals just because someone else signed a press release and called it a win.

Before we get into the weeds, let’s consider this. What happens if the outcome isn’t what we like? What if the announcement is performative or one-sided or vague? Because here’s what people forget. The vast majority of what we’ll hear will be unilateral impositions by Donald Trump. They’re not “deals.” They’re dictates. They’re done to appear like diplomacy. And that distinction matters.

Now, I’m not a global economist or a geopolitical strategist. I’m not inside Mark Carney’s brain. But I do trust one thing and that’s his focus. Every time he speaks about these talks, it’s clear: he’s focused on getting the best deal for Canada. Not a deal for a photo op. Not a deal to please a TV audience. A deal that benefits us and holds up over time.

I’ve spent the last few days digging into the so-called “agreements” Trump has touted with Japan, the EU, and the UK. And let me be blunt: I’m not impressed. Let’s start with Japan. It is vague at best. It reads more like a framework than an actual agreement. There are few hard targets, no enforcement mechanism, and no timeline. So how do you even know if it’s real? You don’t. It’s Trump-style diplomacy: big on bluster, short on detail, and designed for the optics. The EU? Even more complicated. Yes, it’s a bloc, but every single one of its 27 member countries must ratify any final agreement. I can’t imagine France’s François Bayrou agreeing to anything without climate considerations or Hungary’s Viktor Orbán deciding to be compliant. They can block it. And if just one country doesn’t sign off? It collapses. So let’s not pretend this is a done deal.

And Ursula von der Leyen. Sitting there while Trump ranted about windmills and not a word. Just a polite nod. That told me all I needed to know. That moment wasn’t about policy it was about playing the game to keep Trump happy.

Now back to Canada, because that’s what really matters here. Mark Carney is not going to walk into a room and agree to something he knows we can’t deliver on. That’s not the kind of leadership we need, and thankfully, it’s not the kind we have. But that won’t stop the critics. They’ll say, “Why can’t we do what Japan did?” or “Why didn’t we sign like the EU?” Well because those weren’t real deals. And this isn’t pretend.

So while Trump stands on podiums making grand declarations, Carney is working behind the scenes on trade corridors, supply chains, and logistics frameworks that will make Canada stronger, not just now, but for generations. That’s not part of Trump’s thought process. That’s not even on his radar. For him, it’s all about spectacle. It agitates me, genuinely, that we’re even comparing a thoughtful, long-term economic strategy to this showboating nonsense. We need to stop pretending these things are equal.

We don’t know what the outcome will be on August 1st. But I do know this: whatever gets announced, read it twice. Because the truth is usually hiding behind the fireworks. And if it costs me a little more, in the short term, to support a process that protects my kids’ future and Canada’s long-term interests, then I’m okay with that.

Because belief isn’t just a feeling. It’s a choice. And today, I choose to believe in Canada. And maybe it’s fitting that the image here is the Peace Arch, that quiet border crossing between British Columbia, and Washington. The monument itself was built in 1921 to celebrate the longest undefended border in the world, a symbol of friendship and cooperation between two nations who have stood side by side in war, trade, and peace. Etched into that arch is the inscription: “Children of a common mother.” and on one of the gates the powerful words, “May these gates never be closed.” You can’t look at those words today without feeling a knot in your throat. Because while the border may still be open, the spirit behind those words feels fragile. Strained. At risk. And that, right there, is the tragedy.

So no, this isn’t just about economics. It’s about sovereignty. It’s about decency. It’s about the kind of country we want to be, and the kind of country we want to leave for those coming after us. So while connection between our countries may never be the same economically, I will hold on to the hope that those gates never close.

July 28, 2025

Posted: August 3, 2025 in Uncategorized

Trump’s suddenly a compassion filled humanitarian? Please pass the barf bag. I am disgusted.

What better way to dodge the Epstein spotlight than to suddenly slap on a halo and pretend you’re a saint? Give me a break. In the past 24 hours, Donald Trump has magically rebranded himself from chaos agent to humanitarian-in-chief. We’re now meant to believe he’s deeply concerned about starving children in Gaza. Please don’t forget that this is the same man who dismantled U.S. contributions to global food aid and let warehouses full of emergency supplies rot under his watch. He undermined international relief systems, and we’re expected to buy his wide-eyed concern for the suffering?

He says he’s sent $60 million in food support last week, but of course, adds that it’s “being stolen.” Yes Trump. Leave a backdoor out.

Then there’s his whiplash-inducing shift on Russia. Suddenly, if Putin doesn’t shape up, he says he’ll impose tariffs and sanctions in 10 to 12 days. Why not 14? That’s usually his favourite magical time frame to kick the can. But no, this one’s “10 or 12,” because well there’s reasons. Because vague is the game when you have no plan.

And now this morning, he’s sitting with UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer like some elder statesman of peace and compassion. A man who once said he’d bomb civilians, now wants credit for caring? The same man who tried to shake down Ukraine for dirt, now cloaks himself in concern for their suffering?

And then, surprise surprise, out comes what I’ll refer to as the ‘God card.’ I wouldn’t be surprised if next week we get a carefully staged photo of him clutching a Bible, again, upside down, standing outside a burned-out aid truck.

You can almost picture this scene: Trump, pacing, saying to his loyal contingent as they brief him that the Epstein files case is heating up further, “My best shot is if they think I am concerned about starving children. People will forgive when they see me stepping up.”

That’s what this is. Not a change of heart. A change of strategy. An image rehab tour disguised as moral awakening. Because here’s the truth: the Epstein case isn’t going away. His name is being whispered in the halls of Congress, screamed on podcasts, and sprayed across conspiracy-laden timelines. Trump’s proximity to that fire is real. And like any cornered animal, he’s doing what he does best distracting, deflecting, and inventing a new storyline to survive the moment.

So no, I’m not saying don’t welcome food aid or pressure on Russia. By all means, let the man throw us a bone if it gets results. But let’s not pretend we’re watching a redemption arc. This isn’t rebirth. It’s repackaging.

The core of the man hasn’t changed. He’s not Moses parting the Red Sea. He’s just trying to drain the swamp of headlines with his own crocodile tears.

Today’s soft-focus messiah routine is just the latest act in the show. Because if the press and the public start to believe he’s suddenly found empathy, maybe, just maybe, they’ll forget that his name keeps surfacing in one of the darkest scandals of the century.

Don’t be fooled by this charlatan. This isn’t compassion, it’s camouflage. A man doesn’t grow a heart overnight. He just grows more desperate. I am definitely not fooled but am grateful for aid that will come from the American people. Today’s tearful saviour is tomorrow’s tantrum thrower. And he knows that if he doesn’t sell this “Compassion Trump” character well enough? Epstein stays on the menu.

July 27, 2025

Posted: August 3, 2025 in Uncategorized
Tags: , , , ,

What did I actually just witness? Normally, I wouldn’t be doing a post at this time of day. But because I’ve spoken recently about the importance of this U.S.–EU deal and what it could signal to Canadians, I felt it was important to put something out there right away. Just a reminder that this is where I stand right now. My opinion might change if more information becomes available. (Imagine that, a person adjusting their view based on facts! Wild, I know.)

So here we go. We just watched Donald Trump and Ursula von der Leyen announce what was alternately called a deal, a framework, a partnership, and, let’s be honest a show. It happened at Trump’s golf course in Scotland, following what we’re told was a meeting that lasted less than one hour.

Let me repeat that: less than one hour.

So, I ask you: What real trade deal between the world’s two largest economies, involving $750 billion in energy, $600 billion in U.S. investments, “hundreds of billions” in military purchases, and no documentation, gets hammered out in under 60 minutes?

It doesn’t. This was performative. And it worked, for Trump. He got to sit there and declare “the biggest deal ever made,” while von der Leyen smiled politely, said all the right diplomatic things, and let the man-child bask in his imaginary glory.

But here’s the problem: we still don’t know what this actually is.

There was no written agreement. No release of the framework text. No clarity on timelines for these alleged investments. No mention of climate policy, which is foundational for the EU in every negotiation. Steel? Still untouched. Pharmaceuticals? Excluded. CHIPS? Deferred to Trump’s favourite timeline: “two weeks.”

The numbers thrown around were large. $750B, $600B, “hundreds of billions” seem completely unverified. And without a timeframe, they mean nothing. I could say I’m buying a cottage in the Muskokas. Sounds great. Doesn’t make it true. Not unless I’ve got a few hundred years and a magic money tree.

So, what does this mean for Canada?

Well, we don’t know yet. But we should be paying attention.

This vague spectacle doesn’t necessarily threaten us, but it does signal how Trump is approaching trade: with optics first, substance later (if ever). We’ve got our own looming deadline on tariffs, and despite new relationships being built we still have our own deeply integrated economic ties with the U.S. but also expanded economic ties with the EU. How this deal unfolds could very well shape the tone of upcoming negotiations with Canada.

That’s why I’m not panicking but I am watching. Because Ursula von der Leyen has been in real, ongoing talks with Prime Minister Mark Carney. On climate, regulation and on trade standards. My instincts say they’ve spoken recently, maybe even this morning. And while I do think concessions were made between the EU and the U.S., I do not believe this agreement is as it was presented.

Ursula played this smart. Savvy, even. She gave Trump the optics he needed without surrendering the EU’s deeper priorities or at least not visibly. But a reminder: until there’s a document with dates, mechanisms, and enforcement, there is no deal. There is, at best, a placeholder. At worst, a photo op.

And we need to remember, too, that Canada has its own long-standing relationship with the EU, built on predictability, regulation, and climate accountability and a new enhanced relationship built on relationship where our Prime MInister is considered to be a key allie. I don’t believe that relationship disappeared just because Trump needed a stage today. If anything, I’m more convinced that the real diplomacy is still happening, off-camera.

So here I am, asking questions, reflecting out loud, and inviting feedback. I’m not claiming to have the answers, just raising the red flags I see flapping wildly in the Scottish wind.

And for anyone wondering how it all landed, I’ll just leave you with this image: the EU and U.S. flags, side by side, planted squarely in a sand trap. Fitting, really. They walked out claiming the biggest deal ever made, and left it resting in the sand, soft beneath the surface. Not exactly solid ground. Some might even call it quicksand.

July 26, 2025

Posted: August 3, 2025 in Uncategorized
Tags: , , , ,

I might have to start getting up at 4 a.m. (or start doing lives, because Trump’s tantrums don’t respect my posting schedule)

I’ve discovered something. My commitment to writing thoughtful posts the night before and publishing them at 7 a.m. is becoming less of a routine and more of a liability. Because, between 10 p.m. and sunrise, Donald Trump inevitably throws another tantrum, drops another truthless screed, or tries to dismantle international relations. It’s exhausting. But here we are again.

I had a whole post lined up, and then Trump declared he was “done negotiating” with Canada. And now people are asking me, “Nancy, do you still think Mark Carney is the right one to handle this?”

Yes. I stand exactly where I stood. Carney is the only one in this country who has both the credentials and the composure to deal with Trump basically by not ‘dealing’ with him at all. Because, as I’ve said before and I’ll keep saying: you don’t negotiate with crazy. You route around it.

And that’s exactly what Carney is doing. Let’s not forget what he said the night he became Prime Minister. I’ve quoted it before and I’ll paraphrase again: ‘the Canada–U.S. relationship as we knew it is over.’ And maybe that’s what some of us are still struggling to accept. Maybe I am too.

A few weeks ago, I posted an image of a cracked road that resonated widely. Well, that crack? It’s now a full-blown canyon. And unless something, or someone, removes the unstable force at the center of it, we’re not crossing that bridge any time soon.

Now, here’s what you didn’t hear in Trump’s tantrum: according to credible sources, the real trigger was money. Trump demanded what’s been described as a “one-time loyalty fee” from Canada, a price to be paid for tariff relief. Call it a handshake. Call it a favour. Call it what it is: extortion.

And Carney? He told him to pound salt. Or, more accurately, he told him no, the Canadian way: quietly, firmly, and repeatedly.
Trump didn’t take it well.

And that’s why we’re here. This wasn’t a trade breakdown. This was a mobster getting snubbed by a banker who saw the scam coming ten miles away. The threats and the 35% tariff bluff are because Carney wouldn’t buy in.

And here’s something Canadians and Americans need to understand: when Trump says he’ll “have all these deals in place,” they’re not negotiated agreements. They are imposed conditions. One-sided ultimatums dressed up as diplomacy. There’s no give and take. No mutual interest. Just a string of threats, followed by declarations of success when the other party either folds, or walks.

Please, for the sake of truth and sovereignty, don’t take him at his word. Don’t listen to the noise. Do your due diligence. Read real sources. Get the straight goods on what he’s actually done, not what he claims to have done. Because the words are meaningless. The record is what matters.

Meanwhile, Carney’s been building the bypass: finalizing the Canada–Mexico Trade Corridor, with no American permission slip required, locking in historic agreements with the EU and Japan, launching Canada’s Energy and Transportation Sovereignty Corridor, connecting provinces and territories coast to coast to coast, and preparing retaliatory tariffs and a Buy Canadian strategy that actually hits Trump where it hurts, his electoral map.

Trump has taken a detour to Scotland, where even his ancestral homeland wants no part of him. He renamed a golf course after his mother, hoping to buy affection. It didn’t work. The cliffs, the castles, the wind-swept resistance, they said no. The land of fierce rebellions and long memory doesn’t forget. To my ancestors from those highlands: thank you. You did us proud.

Now, tucked into this week’s schedule is another meeting we should all be watching: Trump is expected to meet with representatives of the European Union. I’m hoping they hold the line, as they’ve publicly indicated they would, in standing by Canada in this process. Whether they stand firm or bend will speak volumes. At least, it will to me. So let’s put a sticky note on that one. Bookmark it and watch it. Because the outcome of that meeting could quietly shape the next chapter in all of this.

And as for Canada? We’re not backing down. We’re not bending.
And if being “tough and nasty” is what it takes to defend our sovereignty? Then yeah, we are. Nicely. I am happy to have that handle. Because Canada doesn’t do fealty. We do strategy. We do dignity.

We’re already partway across a long, solid span, something real, something built to last. It stretches across deep waters, connecting more than just provinces. It represents who we are: a country that doesn’t flinch when the crossing gets tough. We’re not at the other side yet. But the pillars are strong, the direction is clear, and we’re moving forward. One kilometre at a time. No turning back now.

July 25, 2025

Posted: August 3, 2025 in Uncategorized
Tags: , , , ,

There are some things I’ve avoided writing about. Not because I don’t care, but because I care so deeply. I’m afraid I’ll say the wrong thing. I worry that I don’t know enough. I worry that someone will be offended. But some images burn so deeply into your brain that silence feels like complicity. And today I didn’t allow myself to scroll past. I forced myself to look at every one of those images.

You know the ones I mean. The images coming out of Gaza, of children starving, of skeletal babies with wide eyes and no voice left to cry are more than I can bear. And more than anyone should bear.

Let’s put something on the table right now: Hamas is a terrorist organization. It has done enormous harm, not only to Israel but to its own people. That is not in dispute. I’m not here to defend terrorists. No one should be. But this is one of those times when more than one thing can be true at the same time.

We can condemn Hamas AND condemn the deliberate blockade of food to civilians.

We can mourn the horrific attacks of October 7 AND be outraged at a policy of collective punishment that leaves children to die of hunger.

We can believe in Israel’s right to exist AND still demand that humanitarian law be followed by everyone.

And so here it is: no child on this planet should be starving. No child should be shot at while trying to reach food. And yet we are seeing both. In real time. On our screens. And the world is fumbling through excuses. Some claim that Hamas steals the food, that they’re to blame. But let’s talk facts. The United Nations and the World Food Programme, highly trained, internationally respected humanitarian bodies are not being permitted to run this operation. Why? Because the U.S. and Israel say they’ll “handle it.” But they are NOT handling it.

The World Food Programme has publicly stated they are ready to deploy 400 aid distribution sites to avoid the kind of chaos that leads to violence and desperation. But they are being blocked. Not invited to the table. And what a bitter irony, people starving, and we’re locking out the people with food.

The International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement, also prepared and willing, is being sidelined. These organizations exist for moments exactly like this, war, disaster, famine, and yet they’re standing by with full capacity while children die.

Tonight, Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement. And while I’ve been critical that he maybe wasn’t speaking out enough, this was important: “Canada condemns the Israeli government’s failure to prevent the rapidly deteriorating humanitarian disaster in Gaza. Israel’s control of aid distribution must be replaced by comprehensive provision of humanitarian assistance led by international organizations. Many of these are holding significant Canadian-funded aid which has been blocked from delivery to starving civilians. This denial of humanitarian aid is a violation of international law.”

From me to PM Carney: ” Thank you for taking this step. For saying out loud what needed to be said. But this is only the beginning. We need more than condemnation. We need action. Canada must now push harder, louder, and with real urgency to ensure that aid flows. Words matter. But what you do next matters more.”

Under international humanitarian law, including the Geneva Conventions, civilians must be protected during conflict. Aid must be allowed to flow. Blocking it is not just immoral. It’s illegal. Some will respond to this with more “What about Hamas?” noise. But I’m going to say it clearly: I’m not entertaining that in this post. I know what Hamas is. We all do. But if your outrage ends there, and doesn’t extend to starving children then it’s not really outrage, is it? It’s politics. And politics should never be more important than human life.

We don’t know when this war will end. Maybe not for a long time. But we can’t wait for peace to begin humanitarian aid. When my children were young, they’d get up from their comfy beds, eat breakfast, cereal, toast, maybe pancakes on weekends, and head off to school. There were swimming lessons, football practice, and rainy movie nights curled up in the fifth wheel.

I know not every child in North America has that life. My kids knew that too. We talked about it. We volunteered. We supported programs in our community to help those who had less. This is not comparable. In North America, even when families struggle, food exists. Programs exist. There is no systemic blockade between a child and their survival. What’s happening in Gaza isn’t poverty. It’s manufactured starvation. It’s children dying not because there’s no food, but because we are refusing to let it reach them. Mothers are burying children with bloated bellies and sunken eyes. Kids are dying, not just from bombs but from emptiness.

So I’m done staying quiet. I’m done worrying about who I’ll offend. Because if this offends you, if demanding food for children offends you, then I don’t think we’re on the same team.

I am an Albertan. I am a Canadian. But ultimately, I am a citizen of the world. And as a citizen of the world, I have to scream this: We need to let the aid in. Now.

Please speak up. No matter what country you’re in. Contact your MP, your congressperson, your representative. Write. Share. Demand that humanitarian organizations like the UN, the World Food Programme, and the Red Crescent be allowed to do their jobs.

The war may not be over. But the starvation can be. If you can scroll past starving children and still argue about politics, you’re not defending your values, you’re burying them.