Posts Tagged ‘writing’

September 11

Posted: September 11, 2025 in Uncategorized
Tags: , , , ,

Twenty-four years. I remember every moment.

I had just sent my older son off to school. My younger one was a toddler, wandering around the kitchen while I stood at the island with paperwork spread everywhere, the TV set propped on the counter. And then the news alert saying the first tower was hit. Like everyone else, I was watching when the second was hit. I didn’t sit down. I just stood there, trying to keep my little one occupied, trying to absorb something that would change all of us forever.

My dad was still alive then. I called him from Calgary, his voice steady from New Brunswick, but we both knew this was different. He was a man who lived by service, signing on with the Royal Canadian Air Force in 1941, then dedicating his life to his community and volunteerism. We spent much of that day talking and processing what we had seen and heard. That day reminded me just how fragile the world could be, and how deeply our choices matter. The loss of innocence for the generation before me was the Second World War. For me, it was September 11, 2001.

My sister and her husband live in Gander, Newfoundland and like most of the community opened their hearts when the planes arrived. My brother in law was an air traffic controller, but more importantly a very active member of his community. And that small community of fewer than 10,000 took in almost 7,000 stranded passengers. If you don’t know that story, you don’t know one of the proudest chapters in Canadian history. They fed, housed, clothed, and comforted complete strangers. They showed the world what it means to be human.

That day was also a reminder of the Canada–U.S. relationship. In modern history, outside of the Second World War, there has been no moment when we stood more firmly with our American friends. We didn’t hesitate. Because geography placed us side by side, but history, sacrifice,and human decency kept us there.

It was John F. Kennedy, speaking in Canada’s House of Commons in 1961, who said it best:

“Geography has made us neighbors.
History has made us friends.
Economics has made us partners.
And necessity has made us allies.
Those whom nature hath so joined together, let no man put asunder.”

That is what I hold onto today. Because I look at where we are now, at the toxic politics, at the self-serving narcissism of one man determined to tear countries apart rather than bring them together, and I think: my God, what a loss. The Department of War is not strength. Defense is strength. Community is strength. Humanity is strength.

For those too young to remember 9/11: this isn’t about the loss of shampoo bottles in your checked luggage or the inconvenience of airport security lines. It’s about the moment when thousands of lives were ended in real time, on live television. It’s about the day when every school teacher in North America looked at their classroom differently, wondering how to explain the unexplainable to terrified children. It’s about the trauma imprint, on parents, on kids, on communities, that still lingers close to a quarter century later.

I think of my own children and how that fear landed in our home. The phone calls to family. The way the air itself felt heavier. The stunned silence on streets and in the grocery store. I believe as I speak these words, I can still feel what it felt like. And as I write, I try to honour both the factual pieces of that day and the raw human pieces of how we felt.

That is why Gander matters. That is why our shared history matters. We rose to support our American neighbours not because of politics, but because of humanity. Because Canadians understood instinctively that the border was invisible when people were in need. And we acted on it.

And yet, walking through every single day now, watching the constant erosion of our shared ideals, the loss of that relationship between the United States and Canada feels even more hurtful. The U.S. once needed and wanted the world’s help. Now, under leaders who confuse bravado with strength, it acts as though it doesn’t. That breaks something in me. Because for all our differences, for all our arguments, the bond forged in tragedy should have been unbreakable.

But bonds only hold if we choose to honour them. The lesson of September 11th isn’t just about vigilance; it’s about unity. It’s about ordinary people doing extraordinary things in the face of fear. It’s about our country who opened its arms to stranded strangers and made them neighbours.

I miss being able to call my dad to talk about the things going on in our world, to hear what he would say. And yet, I’m also glad he isn’t here to see the anger and division that have followed. What I know is this: there are still people fighting for our country, not with weapons, but with words, service, and courage. They are the counterweight to war. The living proof of Kennedy’s words.

We say we will never forget. And we shouldn’t. Because forgetting isn’t just about losing memory; it’s about losing ourselves. And if September 11th taught me anything, it’s that the opposite of fear is not comfort, but action.

On that day, our innocence shattered, but our humanity showed. Today, our politics are bitter, but our capacity for decency still exists. It’s up to us to defend it, fiercely, to make sure geography and history continue to bind us, and to refuse to let any man, no matter how powerful, put it asunder.

Life is short

Posted: August 12, 2025 in Uncategorized
Tags: , , , ,

Life is short…I am writing this as one of my highest-level appeals. Please, I implore you to pay attention.

On November 6th, when the U.S. election ended, I spoke to the people closest to me about what it meant for our world. Intellectually, I knew the dangers. I talked about them often. But deep down, I didn’t believe we would end up here. I was upset enough to stop writing about politics for months. I hoped it wouldn’t come to this.

But here we are. Donald Trump, and let’s stop sugarcoating this, is a dangerous man. I believe he is a psychopath. If he is capable of genuine love, perhaps some child or grandchild will tell me so. I cannot comprehend a human being with such a lack of compassion, such an absence of moral core, without some clinical explanation.

And now we have the National Guard moving into Washington, D.C. We don’t know exactly what’s next, another city, another country? On Friday he will be in Alaska, where the only thing separating Russia and North America is a narrow strip of the Bering Strait. Trump is set to meet with Vladimir Putin there. That’s not just a photo op. And it terrifies me. What exactly will Trump promise him? What would he give away? We know Putin doesn’t respect Trump, but he can use him. And that’s more dangerous.

The picture I’m using for this post comes from Alaska, but it’s not just any Alaska picture. It’s my late friend Marcus Payne, flying his beloved aircraft over his homeland’s ice fields. Marcus was a Renaissance man of unbelievable talent. He wasn’t just an airshow pilot and TV personality, he was a U.S. Air Force veteran, a lawyer, a Washington lobbyist, a missionary, and an environmentalist. And oh, the political conversations we had. We lost him tragically nine years doing what he loved, but I can tell you, we would have had a lot to talk about now. He believed in living with purpose, and he understood how fragile both our environment and our democracies are. That’s why this image matters, because the stakes we face are as sharp and real as the glacier walls beneath his wings.

For my fellow Albertans flirting with separatism, listen carefully: if you think Alberta could somehow be better off alone, you are wrong. You will not be strong enough, no matter how much oil and gas you have, to stand against the American machine. You will lose control over your resources. You will lose your say in how they are managed. And you will be at the mercy of leaders who would happily trade your future for their personal gain.

I’ve written post after post asking people to explain how Pierre Poilievre would operate in today’s geopolitical climate, the one Mark Carney is currently navigating. I’ve yet to see a single thoughtful, detailed answer. Publicly, I get slogans. Privately, I get messages that range from nonsensical to outright frightening. But not once has anyone been able to describe how Poilievre would handle Trump, Putin, or China while safeguarding Canada’s sovereignty.

Although I always write from the heart, with passion, urgency, and the hope that people will better inform themselves, this time is different. This one is affecting me more deeply. No one likes to think about being in the last part of their life. But I never imagined I’d be in this stage terrified for the world I’m leaving behind for my children, grandchildren, and everyone who comes after. My need to speak up is more urgent than it has ever been. I will not let anyone say I stayed silent. I will not have it said that I didn’t try to help people understand how critical our situation is.

I know it’s hard to know what we can do. People ask me all the time, “But what can I do?” Maybe my words here don’t feel as effective as they could be. After all, most of my readers already think like I do. But if you have friends in the U.S., or anywhere else in the world, share this with them. We need to go beyond “I hate Trump” or shallow political insults. We need to talk about what his leadership really means.

These are not just distraction tactics from Trump. It’s his lifetime pattern. Call it narcissism if you like, but it’s something far beyond the everyday kind.

So, who still stands by him? In my view, there are four groups:

1. The MAGA base, statistically more likely to be less informed or less educated. That’s not an insult, it’s reality. But it’s also no excuse. 2. Christian fundamentalists who are sometimes organized under banners like The Family, who push a narrow, rigid worldview into public policy. Their vision of morality is less about compassion and more about control. 3. Billionaires (and “billionaires-lite”) they care only about increasing already obscene fortunes, no matter the human cost. and 4. Republican lawmakers who have abandoned any vision of what is right, and sold their integrity to cling to power.

And to those lawmakers, I ask again: did you not think of your daughters when women’s rights were stripped away? Where are you as education and research to benefit your grandchildren is erased. And how can you ignore that the United States is beginning to look more like The Handmaid’s Tale than the “land of the free”? And to the daughters and sons of these lawmakers, the millennials, the Gen Xers, please speak up. Maybe hearing it from you will pierce the armour of power and greed. Someday those lawmakers will be on their deathbed, and will their final words be, “My God, I ignored my own child so I could hold onto my seat”? How pitiful.

We are standing at a point where silence is complicity. Our voices have to be loud, so loud they can’t be ignored, so loud they carry across borders and into the rooms where decisions are being made. Every single person’s voice matters, no matter how small you think your reach is. I, for one, will use mine in every way possible. If my role in this fight is to write these words, to push, prod, and occasionally shove people into paying attention then I will keep doing it. Not because I like shouting into the void, but because I refuse to be like one of those legislators lying on my deathbed thinking, I didn’t do enough.

Hope and defiance can live in the same breath. Hope says there is still time to change things. Defiance says we will fight like hell to make sure we do. So write, speak, march, vote, shout, actually whatever your voice looks like, use it. Because the worst thing we can do right now is nothing. And nothing is exactly what those in power are counting on.

July 9, 2025

Posted: August 3, 2025 in Uncategorized
Tags: , , , ,

So, Benjamin Netanyahu is reportedly nominating Donald J. Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize. Because of course he is. What better way for Bibi to flatter his own ego while distracting from his horrific international reputation.

The rationale? Supposedly because of the Abraham Accords, a set of diplomatic agreements signed in 2020 during Trump’s first presidency, normalizing relations between Israel and a few Arab nations: the UAE, Bahrain, Morocco, and Sudan. These were significant steps, no doubt. But let’s not kid ourselves, they came with arms deals, the complete sidelining of the Palestinian people, and the distinct whiff of transactional diplomacy. The ink wasn’t even dry before Trump turned the moment into a 2020 campaign asset and Netanyahu used it to flex before an audience of increasingly uneasy Israeli voters. Fast forward to 2025.

Now, before anyone panics: this nomination isn’t for this year’s Peace Prize, unless Netanyahu managed to quietly submit it before the January 31 deadline, which no one seems to believe he did. That means we’re likely talking October 2026. So, deep breath. You’ve got time to be disillusioned in stages.

Previously every time Trump’s name got mentioned in the same breath as the Peace Prize I’d feel my blood pressure spike. It offended me, not just politically, but morally. The very idea that a man who actively undermined alliances, courted despots, mocked the international order, and fanned the flames of domestic insurrection could receive that prize? It felt obscene.

But something has shifted. And it’s not because I’ve become indifferent to peace. Quite the opposite, it’s because I care so deeply about the concept of peace that I’ve decided not to look for its validation in the Nobel.

Let’s talk about the rules for a second. The Nobel Peace Prize, according to Alfred Nobel’s will, should go to the person or organization that has done “the most or the best work for fraternity between nations, the abolition or reduction of standing armies, and the holding and promotion of peace congresses.” That’s a noble goal. But in practice? The rules are discretionary. There’s no official short list, no vetting of criminal records, no requirement for lasting peace, just significant action that someone, somewhere, thinks nudged the world in the right direction.

Eligible nominators include members of national parliaments, heads of state, university professors, and past laureates. Netanyahu, as a sitting prime minister qualifies. And if the committee wants to take it seriously, they can. Or they can file it under “we’ll pretend to read this later” and move on.

But here’s where it shifts for me. Because if this nomination is what it takes to get Trump back onside with supporting Ukraine then I’m not sure I care about the price of that bribe. Because today Trump reversed course and endorsed continued U.S. weapons aid. If dangling a gold medallion in front of him helps even a little in resisting Putin’s bloodlust, fine. Let him have the shiny object.

Because the truth is, the Peace Prize has already been handed to people with long shadows. Henry Kissinger, and Yasser Arafat, and really even Barack Obama win was aspirational more than earned. The award has always been half idealism, half geopolitics. Sometimes it celebrates courageous changemakers. Other times it gets used to slap a sauve on a festering wound and call it healing. So if that’s the game, I’m not going to rage at the players anymore.

I used to think the prize itself stood for something unshakable. But peace is not a PR strategy, and we cheapen it when we hand out accolades like participation medals in a global ego contest. So if Trump wants a Nobel to cap his legacy, let him chase it. If it keeps him vaguely pointed in the direction of global cooperation, fine. Everyone’s got their own fight to fight. And I’m not going to fight over this one.

Because here’s where I’ve landed: I’m not shocked anymore. I’m not angry. I’m not even disappointed. I’m done caring. The Nobel Peace Prize? It just doesn’t mean anything. And whether Trump wins it or not? It has no bearing on the things I actually care about, like whether people are still dying in Gaza, or if Ukraine gets shelled into a crater, or if children anywhere have to grow up in rubble.

Give him the prize. Wrap it in velvet. Let him hang it in Mar-a-Lago next to a fake Time Magazine cover. If it shuts him up and slows the march to another war, I’m good with that. Because in the grand scheme, whether he wins it or not is just not the most important thing to me anymore. Peace is. Not props. Not pageantry. As for the signficance of this medal. Maybe it once stood for something but now I question that and I’m fine if they give it to whoever needs it to behave, like the promised treat if the tantrum stops. If it keeps the missiles grounded and the egos quiet, hand it over and move on. I just can’t waste my energy on this one. Not when there are actual lives at stake elsewhere. Not when the prize itself has already been gamified. Not when the possibility is that someone behaves better just because they want a sticker.